Settlement in Honda Civic mpg case receives tentative OK

iluvmycsx

Mr Csx
VIP Member
3,216
1,317
Regina - The City That Rhymes with Fun
Vehicle Model
Acura Csx
Body Style
Sedan
Settlement In Hybrid Civic Case Tentatively Approved:
A U.S. Superior Court judge in California tentatively approved a settlement that will give Honda Civic hybrid owners up to $200 cash to settle claims that the car's fuel economy was falsely advertised, the Associated Press reported.
2006_Civic_Hybrid_04.jpg


The owners of about 200,000 Honda Civics from model years 2003 through 2009 will receive between $100 and $200, plus a rebate toward the purchase of a new Honda, according to the Associated Press.
Superior Court Judge Timothy Taylor also approved $8.5 million in plaintiff attorney fees under the ruling issued Thursday, the AP reported.

"No doubt plaintiffs would have loved to have gotten more," Taylor wrote in the tentative ruling. "Honda undoubtedly has many arrows left in its quiver, and certainly would have preferred to pay nothing."
The class-action settlement gained national attention in January when Heather Peters, 46, of Los Angeles, filed a $10,000 suit against Honda in small-claims court in Torrance, Calif., where American Honda is headquartered.

Peters claimed her 2006 Civic Hybrid failed to live up to gasoline mileage expectations and won $9,867 with the court ruling that the carmaker had negligently misled Peters when it contended that her hybrid would get as much as 50 miles per gallon, The Los Angeles Times reported last month. Honda filed an appeal in that case.

Peters opted out of the class-action settlement reached in September 2011 so she could try to claim a larger damage award. The original class-action suit in 2007 claimed that the Civic's mpg fell short, similar to the way Peters described her case.

Honda has acknowledged that the battery on 2006-08 Civic Hybrids "may deteriorate and eventually fail" earlier than expected, causing the cars to rely on the gasoline engine more, compromising the fuel economy, according to the Times.

Taylor scheduled a hearing today to give opponents a last chance to voice objections, the AP reported.
Peters said she plans to ask for a continuance in the settlement at today's hearing, and that the judge overlooked some evidence on safety issues, the Associated Press reported.
American Honda can back out of the agreement if more than 1,500 owners opt out, but the automaker has said the settlement is a "very good resolution," according to the AP.
 
her claim pertained to it never hitting the window claims


She claims her hybrid Civic, which she purchased in 2006, failed to deliver on the posted 50-mpg rating. The car achieved closer to 30 mpg because of technical problems involving the battery, according to the lawsuit. The original class-action suit in 2007 claimed the Civic hybrid's actual mpg rating fell short of owners' expectations. The proposed settlement was rejected by a California judge in 2010.
 
Yes, I realize what her claim was, but wondered about long term mileage relating to battery life on other hybrids. Wouldn't people be upset over a substantial reduction in mileage after 10 years?
 
Was this deal OKed Friday or is it still not fully approved? I see tentatively in a lot of articles but wasn't sure. I'm 2k miles under the new extended Warranty (90k), and my IMA light has been on the last 8k miles, and my battery almost no help the last 5k. I'd rather not take it to a dealership now and pay out of pocket and hope for the rebate later.
 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busin...onomy-claims/2012/03/16/gIQAhEQPHS_story.html

similar story - that is what was announced on Friday.


The settlement pays owners of about 200,000 Honda Civics from model years 2003 to 2009 between $100 and $200, plus a rebate toward the purchase of a new Honda. Owners of models from 2006 to 2008 get the larger amount due to additional claims over battery defects.

The judge has valued the settlement at $170 million. Attorneys for the plaintiffs have pegged the value between $87.5 million and $461.3 million, depending largely on how many people accept rebates of up to $1,500.

The judge approved more than $8 million in plaintiff attorneys fees in his 43-page ruling.
 
Back
Top