Postal Service to stop delivering mail on Saturdays

MrsJrotax101

Administrator
Admin
25,905
10,784
The cut begins in August, but six-day package delivery will continue.


postal-02-4_3_r536_c534.jpg


The Postal Service will end Saturday delivery for first class mail this summer, Postmaster General Patrick Donahue said Wednesday.

Package delivery, which has seen growth in recent years as online purchasing booms, will continue under the plan. Postmaster General Patrick Donahue said.

Donahue, saying the plan will save $2 billion annually, called the decision an "important part of our strategy to return to financial stability."

He said the plan would allow for elimination of 22,500 jobs. Donahue said he hoped the job losses could be covered by attrition, buyouts and cutting back on overtime.

The plan should have little impact on speed of delivery except for items that would have been delivered on Saturday, Donahue said.

Last year, Under pressure from Congress and local communities, the cash-strapped agency dropped plans to close thousands of post offices across the nation, instead deciding to trim operations at 13,000 offices.

ap-ny-snow-upstate-ny-4_3_r541_c540.jpg

A U.S. Postal Service vehicle delivers mail during a light snowfall in Nassau, N.Y., in January.(Photo: Mike Groll, AP)


Saturday has the week's lowest daily volume and and more than a third of U.S. businesses are closed Saturday, USPS reports. Most businesses and households surveyed in a national Gallup Poll indicated Saturday would be the least disruptive day to eliminate mail delivery.

Mail will not be scheduled for collection from blue collection boxes on Saturday. Post Offices now open on Saturdays would remain open under the plan, and mail would be delivered to post office boxes. Deposited mail would be processed on Monday.

The American Postal Workers Union has previously decried the plan.

"People don't want to find out who won the Friday night football game on Monday they want to find out on Saturday," said Sally Davidow, the unions communications director.

USPS has faced billion-dollar deficits since 2007 attributed to a combination of the bad economy, the Internet and mandatory pre-funding of retiree health benefits.

USPS doesn't use a dollar of tax money.

"Our financial crisis is the result of a restrictive business model and a permanent and fundamental shift away from First-Class Mail," Postmaster General Patrick Donahoe said last year.

The agency in November reported an annual loss of a record $15.9 billion for the last budget year. The financial losses for the year, which ended Sept. 30, were more than triple the $5.1 billion loss in the previous year. Last year the agency was forced to default on billions in retiree health benefit prepayments to avert bankruptcy.

The agency's biggest problem - and the majority of the red ink in 2012 - was not due to reduced mail flow but rather to mounting mandatory costs for future retiree health benefits, which made up $11.1 billion of the losses. Without that and other related labor expenses, the mail agency sustained an operating loss of $2.4 billion, lower than the previous year.

The health payments are a requirement imposed by Congress in 2006 that the post office set aside $55 billion in an account to cover future medical costs for retirees. The idea was to put $5.5 billion a year into the account for 10 years. That's $5.5 billion the post office doesn't have.

No other government agency is required to make such a payment for future medical benefits. Postal authorities wanted Congress to address the issue last year, but lawmakers finished their session without getting it done. So officials are moving ahead to accelerate their own plan for cost-cutting.

The Postal Service is in the midst of a major restructuring throughout its retail, delivery and mail processing operations. Since 2006, it has cut annual costs by about $15 billion, reduced the size of its career workforce by 193,000 or by 28 percent, and has consolidated more than 200 mail processing locations, officials say.

They say that while the change in the delivery schedule announced Wednesday is one of the actions needed to restore the financial health of the service, they still urgently need lawmakers to act. Officials say they continue to press for legislation that will give them greater flexibility to control costs and make new revenues.

Article from: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...stal-service-delivery-mail-saturdays/1895277/
 
we're going to stop delivery on saturday...

The plan should have little impact on speed of delivery except for items that would have been delivered on Saturday

rocket science.

I'd also say that does impact delivery speed. If it's not there Saturday, it's not there Sunday either... it's Monday. So, there is a lapse from Friday to Monday. I'd say that's impacting the speed of delivery.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Staff
  • #3
Also, if there is a holiday on Monday that the Postal Service is closed on...that's Friday to Tuesday...
 
heck, just cut out mail delivery every day except Sat. One day a week delivery from now on.
 
I liked the first post :)

Mail... Meh I only get junk. I rarely mail ****.
 
Same here booty. I only get junk mail. If the mail service didn't deliver to my house daily and delivered to my house like UPS or FedEx, I'd have less crap in the recycle bin.
 
The junk mail is a large percent of their income, as far as I'm concerned they(USPS) don't even come close to charging enough for mail services........... getting a letter from Fedex, & UPS cost dollars each, where it's still under 50 cents with the USPS.......... Cutting employment isn't helping our ppl

No other government agency is required to make such a payment for future medical benefits. Postal authorities wanted Congress to address the issue last year, but lawmakers finished their session without getting it done. So officials are moving ahead to accelerate their own plan for cost-cutting.

Private companies are required to make such payments.

The thing I don't like is the constant backing out from paying the bennies that were being taken from the employees for retirement and trying not to cover them when they retire............ IE Social Security, which was never suppose to be used on anything but to the ppl that payed into it.......... And this new health care is going to cost the working ppl more , while the only ppl that are going to benefit from it are the ppl that don't make any money in the 1st place, which means they don't pay into the system either........ The ones that Romney was caught talking about...... :D
 
The junk mail is a large percent of their income, as far as I'm concerned they(USPS) don't even come close to charging enough for mail services........... getting a letter from Fedex, & UPS cost dollars each, where it's still under 50 cents with the USPS.......... Cutting employment isn't helping our ppl



Private companies are required to make such payments.

The thing I don't like is the constant backing out from paying the bennies that were being taken from the employees for retirement and trying not to cover them when they retire............ IE Social Security, which was never suppose to be used on anything but to the ppl that payed into it.......... And this new health care is going to cost the working ppl more , while the only ppl that are going to benefit from it are the ppl that don't make any money in the 1st place, which means they don't pay into the system either........ The ones that Romney was caught talking about...... :D

Hehehe. Gonna add you to my favorite people.
 
Back
Top