I agree with you in general they have very strict rules and these exclusivity deals but any rule is sometime bent in the world of the super rich.
that's true in most cases. but most of ferrari's products are so limited that demand exceeds supply. when that's the case, they can afford to be picky about who they sell to. many dealerships even choose not to do business with ANYONE who hasn't previously purchased a ferrari through their dealership. there are people who have the cash but have waited years on a waiting list for even their base models, only to get pushed to buy a used ferrari instead because some BS about not being able to get the cars.
Yes I have heard of the same. I can understand their point, but as said I do not believe in absolutes. I love them but I would never jump through hoops to get one. If I would have so much money I would find a way to get one when and how I want it or buy another one
If you read the exchange, the discussion was about lamborghini's sales practices. He was saying that since Lamborghini does it one way, Ferrari has to be the same, which isn't the case.Sweet baby Jebus that car is delicious! I would personally fill up 80 burlap sacks with babies and drown them all in a river if somebody would give me one of those.
Actually, Lamborghini wouldn't even exist as an auto manufacturer if it wasn't for Ferrari, so in that regard you're wrong. I may be missing a few of the details, but if I'm remembering correctly: Ferruccio Lamborghini owned a Ferrari. There was something he wasn't happy with, and asked Enzo Ferrari to address the issue. Enzo was insulted and berated Lamborghini mercilessly. Long story made shorter: Lamborghini stopped making tractors and set out to make cars that would take sales away from Ferrari.
If anything, that exchange supports the fact that Lamborghini is different from Ferrari. He was so insulted by Ferrari's snotty attitude (which is still apparent today in their sales practices and their beliefs that their cars are for gentlemen only) that he made his own company to be different, and in some ways better.I admit that I made my point out of context from the start, but from a literal point of view I'm still right.
I'm just joking around, and please know that I wasn't trying to mess with you in any way shape or form.
Actually it is good that they disagreed we have now two great brands of super cars
They're both too expensive at the moment for me exclusive or not 
Apparently I am not enough of a gentleman Ha Ha If anything, Ferrari is just as obnoxious as Lamborghini compared to Aston Martin. Now THAT'S a gentleman's racer.Actually it is good that they disagreed we have now two great brands of super cars
But damnit, you'll love that heavy brick due to its beauty!...a beautiful, heavy, brick of a gentleman's racer.
Who owns the gentlemen at Aston these days? I'm not being sarcastic this time. I'm actually asking a question.
