Dragos
Well-Known Member
Im not really sure what all the fuss is about. I didnt buy a Honda civic for an abundant amount of features. I think I'm safe to say that most Americans who buy them arent either. And the sales numbers dont lie. The 2012 Honda Civic is the 5th best selling vehicle in the U.S. with November YTD sales numbers topping 284,000. That same number for the 2011 model was just over 200,000. There are only two cars that are selling more, one is the Honda Accord and the other is the Toyota Camry. When making the choice to buy my civic, comfort, mpg's, reliability, and resale were the deciding factors that led to the purchase over its competitors. In the end I bought a car for under $20000. If I wanted crappy little cheap from the factory features like touch screens, chrome accents, and backup cameras I wouldve bought the Chevy Cruze I test drove. And wait.. Did I just say back up camera?! Who needs a backup camera on a compact car? At the end of the day Its a Honda Civic. Ill drive it forever, it will rarely let me down, and Ill sell it for way more than most of its competitors will be going for 5 years down the road. Dont believe me? Hit up craigslist and do some price checking on some older models. The 2012 Honda civic offers a clean slate (as any civic should) that is begging for a plethora of aftermarket goodies that await me on the internets.
Well said, I do not think Honda ever was the all bells and whistles brand. We also got a pretty sweet deal on the Si models, almost the same price as 2011 but a 2.4 engine that is a big improvement in my opinion. I saw a lot of media complaining that the 8th gens are nicer and so on. I test drove the 8th gens, did not redline them though and was not convinced. 9th gen sold me right away. And I as I said before the simpler no fuss looks was a big plus for me.
Was there a wave of unhappy people that got the 2011 with the smaller engine? I did not see it but did not look for it either.
For me the Si was the best deal for a practical reliable sporty car.