K and N drop in filter

Darkout

Well-Known Member
1,107
807
Cocoa, FL
Vehicle Model
Civic Si
Body Style
Coupe
IMO just the cost savings over time is worth it and it does flow air easier than any paper filters. I'm getting one eventually, just not a high priority right now.
 

squiggy

Cartographer
Super Mod
11,183
6,654
Michiana
Vehicle Model
'12 Civic Si
Body Style
DBP II Coupe

Nomar06

Super Moderator
Super Mod
7,826
4,938
Charlotte, NC
Vehicle Model
Fiesta ST (FiST)
Body Style
hatch
To me, that study/test shows that the, what I believe to be stock filter, performed better in regards to doing its job of filtering dirt. No claims to HP performance or mentioned anything about HP performance.

One can assume that the K&N will net you a gain in HP compared to a stock filter since it allows more air flow but you will also gain more dirt in the engine. Which I'm sure everyone already knows this.
 

Bulkybear

Well-Known Member
1,665
749
From the article

Does it flow better? At very high airflow volumes, probably. BUT, our engines CAN’T flow that much air unless super-modified, so what is the point? The stock filter will flow MORE THAN ENOUGH AIR to give you ALL THE HORSEPOWER the engine has to give.
 

Bulkybear

Well-Known Member
1,665
749
This is the first I have heard of this in relation to performance. Are there any other studies to back up this one?
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest1.htm

This article also illustrates how, by swapping filtration material, the airflow difference isn't enough to make a difference in performance but the filtration difference is significant. The last line sums it up nicely

"I do know that on a relatively stock car with a properly sized air filter, you indeed have very little if any performance to gain by swapping filtration material".

And although K&N has said that nobody has come to them with any proof of oiled filters damaging maf sensors, plenty of people have indeed had this happen. Not worth it IMO.
 
Top