PRL Motorsports Turbo Kit

[prl motorsports]

What's this other thread you speak of?

Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk

 

[prl motorsports]

Got the clutch out and just wanted to show the difference between the 8th and 9th gen flywheel. You need to use the 8th gen flywheel with Competition Clutch due to the suposed CEL issue. You can see the major difference in step height, one is inverse from the other. We did weigh them too, 16lbs on both ... same weight give or take, our scale rounds to the nearest pound.


9th gen on left

9th gen on right

Here are a few more comparison pics, 9th gen on left ...

 

[prl motorsports]

they started a thread about their catback exhaust.
http://9thcivic.com/forum/threads/prl-motorsports-oem-look-3-catback-exhaust.5878/

Thanks for the link ...

 

[webby]

You need to use the 8th gen flywheel with Competition Clutch due to the suposed CEL issue.

this came up in another thread and I talked to doug at hondata about it - as there were users looking to use different flywheels. The cel topic came up, and I thought flashpro could get rid of the cel. It can

It contains the reflash calibration, large injector calibrations, and it can switch off the misfire codes associated with light flywheels.
Doug

 

[prl motorsports]

well, i guess i should say, you have to use an OEM 8th gen flywheel if you don't have flashpro. you can use a lightened 8th gen flywheel if you do have flashpro, at least according to doug, who i would assume knows. regardless either way, they don't have a clutch that fits the 9th gen flywheel or a lightened 9th gen flywheel yet.

 

[webby]

That is true. I was just mentioning it in case you were not aware of flashpro being able to remove the misfire codes.

 

[scootin'civic]

They've posted some street driving and romps on their facebook page! impressive stuff.

 

[NthTier]

21 to 106 in ~10 is sick (esp with some pretty noticeable wheel spin).

 

[scottwhi1]

Time for some new rubber.

Sent from my MB865 using Tapatalk

 

[prl motorsports]

Here are the 10psi results on our dyno ... 388whp!!!!

You can see we had higher numbers but bringing things in to the conservative realm and having to regap the plugs due to missfire this what we ended up with.

4.5psi vs 10psi

 

[Sleepingpanda]

cant wait to see if the rbc intake adds power

 

[spdandpwr]

Hmmmm....I'm really considering doing 4.5 psi un-intercooled or perhaps getting a side mount intercooler. How much would removing the intercooler and associated piping affect costs? Also, where would the bov be located if that was removed? Sorry, I'm not too familiar with turbo setups, but given the fact that the motor runs so well with a lower amount of boost, I may forgo a s/c and go straight to turbo.

 

[VitViper]

Hmmmm....I'm really considering doing 4.5 psi un-intercooled or perhaps getting a side mount intercooler. How much would removing the intercooler and associated piping affect costs? Also, where would the bov be located if that was removed? Sorry, I'm not too familiar with turbo setups, but given the fact that the motor runs so well with a lower amount of boost, I may forgo a s/c and go straight to turbo.

I would not recommend running the kit without an intercooler. Talk about a ton of heat to deal with (it'll cut into power gains pretty badly)