It's interesting though how baseball players linked to PEDs are getting votes to be in the MLB hall of fame. And it's been proven that they used PEDs....
i fully think some of these players should be in the hall, based on the simple fact that there was a closed/sealed record of over 100 current players who tested positive back in 2003 which led to the random testing CBA policy.
many of these players are not known to the public/media/HOF voters, so is it fair that they should be in when ppl who "got caught" arent?
i say you allow any player in, and just have a blurb about them on their plackard/or put them in a special wing denoted "the juice era" or something
it's a part of baseball history, regardless, and should be accepted as such.
baseball was DEAD before the big mac/sosa HR chase... literally DEAD... they revived baseball, then got thrown under the bus. should owners give back the billions they earned on marketing these stars?
i say embrace that they cheated, b/c everybody was doing it at the time.
i also say that any of those players who earned MVP's should be stripped of them at the same time, and retroactively given to the #2 vote getter (unless he was guilty too, then move down until somebody wasnt)
having said all of that, if you look back in the day, before testing, early 80's/etc you think some of those players werent using? they were.
you think back in the 50's, 60's, and 70's those players werent using things like amphetamines to boost their energy levels? come on.
cheating is part of every sport/every game. i'm not saying i agree with it, or that i embrace it, but it's part of the game.
a cheater who is highly skilled is still a highly skilled player.
barry bonds would have been HoF and arguably the best outfielder in the history of baseball even w/o his (alleged) steroids, but he still (allegedly) juiced.